After yesterday's vote for secession from the EU, the UK finishes counting. 50% of the counted ballots give a slight advantage to the supporters of the exit.
This has led to a state of extreme excitement Champions "Evrazrudy", which put forward a new theory regarding these events. Today managed to read even that a million Russian migrants had infected Britain a shovel.More moderate commentators have said about the irreversible consequences of a vote for Britain and for the EU. In any case, the comments served one darker than the other.
In fact, the events have not one, but several aspects and they can directly refer to what does or does Russia. One of the points of view lies in the fact that from the very beginning Britain had fundamentally different views from what we did in mainland Europe. First, it focused on foreign policy and defense. In these areas there have been two poles: France and Germany on the one hand and Britain on the other. Germany was understandable, for her optimism and recklessness was based on a bloodless reunion of the lost, after the war, areas. Therefore, the future was seen as something serene and festive. Bonn and then Berlin, they spoke to contacts with Russia and really considered her as a future ally. It is believed that France ruined by greed. Watching as Germany is rapidly entering new and potentially rich domestic market of Russia, she rushed to catch up with the neighbor, so as not to miss your chance. However, Russia almost immediately showed the whole set of signs of a future dictatorship.Stalled, and then the war in Chechnya has demonstrated the guise of a bloody regime that is forced to disguise due to economic weakness. The 1996 elections showed that democracy in Russia has not caught on and clotting her the rudiments of time. It was then that Britain began to promote a policy of harsh pragmatism with regard to Russia. By the way, London has offered to lead a more balanced policy in relation to China, but then Berlin and Paris have joined forces in a game called "independence." They are not confused by the fact the manual transfer of power from Tsar Boris new potentates.
Tellingly, neither France nor Germany did not bother t the ensuing series of actions, which are nothing else as vonnie crimes can't be qualified. That is, continental Europe demonstrated the possibility of compromise with obvious war criminals.
At the same time began to unfold the events which became the consequences of the tragedy of 9/11. As we recall, the States had the bit in his teeth and rushed to smash anything that could be associated with the organization of a series of attacks. Thus, Washington has shown its citizens that such things no one will get away with it, and wishing to create something similar in the future – to show the value of such exercises. Under the distribution were Iraq and Afghanistan.Now that anyone can remember, but then States it was important to act in coalition.It is understandable that Washington would have coped perfectly well on its own, but then it would look not comme Il faut, in terms of international policy, and the coalition shows a clear solidarity, in that the solution of the problem of many countries.
Many countries have delegated to carry out this operation, only their flags. Roughly speaking, there went a couple dozen military who performed support functions, not getting tangled under the feet strike groups. However, formally, the country has participated in the coalition. About this route went the country of the parent of Europe, who sent their troops, comparable to that put Ukraine or Georgia. Only the British invested in these operations seriously and responsibly. They took the entire sectors of operation, carrying the appropriate damages and losses.London framed the shoulders of the Americans as they had done this for them in two World Wars. Without reasoning, without PR and snot. Germany and France was making lots of sounds, showed the hustle and bustle, but all were in the form of rare artifacts, which nobody really needed.
That is, within Europe formed two vectors of foreign policy, and even two of the approach in assessing fundamental values. Britain has taken a Pro-American stance, and Berlin to Paris and other continental countries, whose weight in decision-making was not so significant, has taken a position of independence, which was to demonstrate the independence of their actions from the States. The result of the Euro-Atlantic structures began openly obeskrivligt. Suffice it to say that NATO lost most of its capacity is at the initiative of Germany and France.They were to drastically reduce the already very powerful armed forces, but most importantly – Germany demanded the withdrawal of us troops from its territory. In fact, in the middle of the "zero" States are almost entirely gone from Europe, left the security issues in the care of Berlin and Paris.
It is clear that Washington could not alert the partners about the real danger of such reckless actions, but France has rules personal friend of Putin, Sarkozy, Germany – Schroeder, who is now a full-time employee of Gazprom, and Italy was in charge of the corrupt Berlusconi, with whom Putin has a lot in common Affairs of a personal nature. At this time with the filing of heads of state in the upper echelons of power in these countries shoals went to the agents of the Kremlin. In the case of Schroeder it has become to be not just open, but got a call, saying, know ours!
At this time Britain withdrew completely from any foreign policy initiatives of the EU. De facto, she has conducted and conducts its own foreign policy and often do not coincide with the EU policy. Moreover, London has remained on the positions of the adoption of billions of money of Russian, Chinese and other origin, but the separation media of the money. All the billionaires that have migrated to the Albion, been under the hood of the British secret service and not allowed to mechanisms of influence on domestic and foreign policy of the country. They clearly indicate a place that has not changed in 20 years.The British are horrified to see what is done by Europeans, allowing documented the Kremlin's agents in the highest spheres of leadership in their countries.
It must be borne in mind that the closed channels in Paris and Berlin received reliable information about the nature of the activities of some of the leading politicians of these countries, however, no reaction followed this exchange of information on intelligence matters almost frozen.
With the outbreak of war in Ukraine time testing those TRANS-European mechanisms that 10 years has built a Paris and Berlin. As expected, no arrangements just yet. The continental Europeans playing your stupid games and when the question arose about the need to ensure their own safety and the safety partners in the EU and NATO, it turned out that to do simply nothing! The European component of NATO was in a position of profound impotence. Mechanisms to effectively counter threats are not created.That is, Europe, led by Germany and a little France, was in the role of a rich gull, which is sticking out of your pocket Lopatnic with loot and prushchego in jam-Packed tram. That is what pile Berlin and Paris, not just is able, without the kick of Washington, to do something in terms of lifting its armed forces, but even to impose sanctions without the slap can not.
As a result, States are being driven in Europe, those same forces, which were taken out at the insistence of Berlin and the funny thing is, a plaintive request it! Fattened on Russian and Chinese bribes of europornzone, but rather eurocorridors have body blows to drive signing sanctions against the aggressor, trampled on the very foundations of European security, signed at Helsinki. And after all this, someone Steinmeier, who is called Minister of foreign Affairs of Germany, tells something about the lifting of sanctions against this aggressor.
Certainly, Europe too had not seen war at home and playing their stupid games. This has happened more than once and always cost millions of lives. It is the complacency and criminal negligence is not tolerated by the healthy part of the same Europe and the world. Not surprisingly, well remembering the charm of a scoop Poland, the Baltics and Romania have a perfectly sane idea about the threats, as Berlin reminds uperevshis coke addict who sees the funny pictures of own production.
Total, Europe failed to stop Russia in Ukraine. She failed to timely and adequately respond to obvious the game of Moscow in the raising and direction of the wave of refugees from Syria to Europe and, most importantly, Europe does not learn. Even the obvious signs of impending disaster don't lead her in a sane state.
Britain can hardly be suspected of lack of experience in international strategy. British intelligence it is difficult to accuse of incompetence and inaction, and the British government – in an incorrect estimate of the incoming signals. As we mentioned above, Europe has received a two-vector in foreign and domestic policy. Britannia showcases the wise pragmatism that has less in common with the corruption and infantilism Germany and France. Roughly speaking, Britain is just tired of the incompetent and ineffectual merrymaking of the French and the Germans.No sane signals and circumstances didn't force Europe to radically reconsider its attitude to the basic principles of security. Perhaps a vote for the exit of Britain from the EU will be given the mediocrity of both capitals real idea of what they are doing. So even the withdrawal of Britain from the EU should be seen as a step in the right direction. This swamp must have something to do.Even if votes for secession is not enough, then the gap will be minimal and, first and foremost, Berlin is required to understand how the destructive course he took the whole of Europe.
Source: http://defence-line.org/
«СЛАВА УКРАЇНІ»МБФ «GLORY TO UKRAINE»ICF «GLOIRE À L'UKRAINE»FIB «СЛАВА УКРАИНЕ»МБФ
